19 Sep 2017
02 Sep 2017
26 Aug 2017
14 Aug 2017
21 Jul 2017
Market Research companies hand out top rankings to a large proportion of Travel Insurance Policies.
Thats Insurance has been much more strict in our ranking process. We have awarded Five Stars to only the very best policies.
We appreciate that not every customer will want nor need a five star policy. The information on the right details exactly what you can expect from a policy with one of our star ratings.
Broadly speaking Three Star policies provide cover which is inline with the market average. Four and Five Star policies provide cover which is above the market average and One and Two star policies provide cover below the market average.
The policy covers all core sections and all secondary sections under a travel policy.
All Core Sections of cover are above the levels of the market average policy.
All secondary sections are either at or above the levels of the market average policy.
Has additional benefits over and above a standard policy.
Includes cover for supplier insolvency as standard.
Includes natural catastrophe cover, either as standard, or as an optional add on.
Has the most competitive premiums in relation to the cover provided, across the range of scenarios tested.
Has clear and consumer friendly, policy wording and explanations of cover.
The policy has an alcohol wording that is more customer friendly than the standard blanket exclusion.
The standard excess is below the level of the market average.
Covers all core sections and secondary sections under a travel policy.
Core Sections of cover either at, or above the levels of the market average.
May have additional benefits over and above the standard policy.
May not automatically include cover for supplier insolvency.
Premiums are competitive premiums in relation to the cover provided across the range of scenarios tested.
Has clear and consumer friendly policy wording and explanations of cover.
The standard excess is either at or below the level of the market average.
Provide cover for all core sections, but may have some secondary sections missing.
May have Core sections of cover that are lower than the level of the market average.
Premiums may not be as competitive, or be consistently competitive across the range of scenarios tested.
The Insurer, may not have been able to provide quotations across the full range of scenarios tested.
The excess may be above the level of the market average.
May have some core sections of cover missing.
May have some secondary sections of cover missing.
Levels of cover tend to be below the market average.
Premiums may be lower than the market average due to the lower levels of cover.
The Standard Excess is higher than the market average.